How to Choose a Captcha-Solving Tool that Works for You The developer API was built to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, scripts and scripts that currently call those services can point at CapSkip with little more than a URL change and zero coding. One of the biggest advantages of running on your own hardware is cost. Most services bill for each solve, so your costs climb the moment volume grows. CapSkip uses fixed pricing and uncapped solves, so you can scale without watching the meter. CapSkip's API is designed to emulate the endpoints of the major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, tools and scripts that currently call other services are able to switch to CapSkip with minimal changes and zero new code. Teams migrating from 2Captcha usually brace for a painful switch. In reality, because CapSkip mirrors the familiar request format, the move is largely swapping the endpoint plus keeping everything else the same. Image CAPTCHAs remain everywhere, on login forms to registration flows. CapSkip solves thousands of image CAPTCHA variants on your own hardware, typically in about a tenth of a second. That kind of speed matters when you process high volumes. Classic image and text CAPTCHAs remain everywhere, on login forms to registration screens. CapSkip solves a huge range of image CAPTCHA variants locally, usually almost instantly. That kind of speed adds up the moment you handle high numbers of challenges. GeeTest challenges can be notoriously awkward for bots, so having a solver that supports them helps a lot. CapSkip solves GeeTest locally, so workflows that depend on these targets do not break when the puzzle appears. Image CAPTCHAs are still everywhere, on login forms to checkout flows. CapSkip solves a huge range of image CAPTCHA types locally, usually in about a tenth of a second. That kind of throughput matters when you handle large numbers of challenges.